For
one reason or another—the chief one being the usual end-of-semester pressure to
tie up loose ends—we have been pretty busy, which is my excuse for neglecting
my duties here on Baltic Avenue.
Yesterday was a truly memorable day, however, thanks to our public
administration colleague, Vilma Tubutiene, who expertly organized a field trip
to Kurtuvėnai, which deserves to be reported on in full. This is the first installment.
Vilma
and her husband have a flat here in the city center, and they also have built a
country house some fifteen kilometers outside the city near the Kurtuvėnai
Regional Park (KRP). One of the highlights
of yesterday’s excursion was a conversation with the director of the park,
Rimvydas Tamulaitis, which took place in the park’s administration building. We were given to understand that like most of
Lithuania’s regional parks, all of which date to the restoration of
independence in 1992, the mission of KRP extends to both conservation of nature
and human recreation. There must be
tradeoffs in such cases, and it’s not easy to get the balance just right.
What
I didn’t appreciate at first was the wide variety of wildlife that exists
within the boundaries of the park, which is quite large (over 17,000 hectares,
most of it heavily forested) and the extent of the park’s resourcefulness in
protecting numerous species of endangered flora and fauna. Park administrators also must be commended
for their skill in securing outside funding for their various conservation
programs and outreach efforts. Photo #1
above shows the park director posing for the camera with our group (from left
to right, front row: Jane Kolson, Arwiphawee
Srithongrung of Wichita State University, Vilma Tubutiene, Oksana Mejere, and
Jurgita Mikolaityte; back row: Ken Kolson, Ken Kriz of Wichita State University,
and park administrator Rimvydas Tamulaitis).
The
Kurtuvėnai Regional Park is on the site of a former estate, one that had the
usual amenities, including a manor house, a barn, a carriage house, stables,
and a brewery on site, not to mention a nearby church that was generously
supported by the local squire. One thing
we have learned in the course of this semester is that Lithuanian
preservationists and conservationists are less timid than their counterparts in
the U.S. about reconstructing buildings that were destroyed. Negotiating a compromise between architectural
aesthetics and historical authenticity doesn’t seem to bother Lithuanian
preservationists, perhaps because so much of their built environment was
destroyed by the wars and strife of the twentieth century. What they call “restoration” often is simply
reconstruction. Whether we realize it
or not, Americans have had the luxury of being a little squeamish about these
kinds of issues.
There
is a carriage house that is in the process of being reconstructed. While it is a handsome building, it completely
lacks the patina of old age. The same
thing is true of the barn, or granary. Because
so many of the buildings are reconstructions, the structure that appealed most
to me was the brick stable (see photo #2, above), which has room for 40
horses. We walked through the
stable. Most of the horses appear to be
thoroughbreds, though there also are a few workhorses (see photo #3, below).
The
mansion at Kurtuvėnai was rebuilt at least five times over four centuries or
so. Early in the twentieth century, the
estate was owned by a family named Plater.
The mansion was destroyed in the Russian civil war following World War
I. Soviet nationalization and the
deportations to Siberia following World War II ruined the Plater family once
and for all, and the estate became a collective farm, or kolkhoz. It seems to have been the residents of the kolkhoz who ransacked the manor house in the late 1950s.
Nearby is a church, Saint Jacob the Apostle, which has a long history extending back to the 17th century (see photo above; yes that's my bride under the yellow umbrella). Like most of the other buildings in the village, the church looked to me--despite the baroque bell towers--like a 19th-century construction; at any rate, it is not the palimpsest that one might reasonably expect of such a venerable building.